tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3738012638904762739.post4534549067983838663..comments2024-03-27T01:19:56.698-07:00Comments on Tralfaz: Hypnotic HickYowphttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09264605351878574044noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3738012638904762739.post-2341168548383098542024-01-05T10:29:20.517-08:002024-01-05T10:29:20.517-08:00Cinerama came first. Then 3-D and Cinemascope. htt...Cinerama came first. Then 3-D and Cinemascope. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=255sLCHaFLg&t=1148sAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3738012638904762739.post-4712262711961236132016-06-18T08:14:15.481-07:002016-06-18T08:14:15.481-07:00Judging by Variety, 3-D was the first craze, with ...Judging by <i>Variety</i>, 3-D was the first craze, with wide-screen formats following a few months, though there was some overlap of the two. I presumed MGM and 20th went with wide-screen because they were developing processes. Yowphttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09264605351878574044noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3738012638904762739.post-12549552940058701982016-06-17T09:30:46.034-07:002016-06-17T09:30:46.034-07:00It seemed as if there was something of a Beta vs. ...It seemed as if there was something of a Beta vs. VHS type battle that went on in the 1953-54 period, with Warners, Paramount and Lantz opting for just 3-D cartoons, while MGM and Terrytoons went with just CinemaScope shorts. Only Disney and UPA tried both, before coming down in the widescreen camp (Warners', Paramount's and Lantz's concession to the format was merely to vertically compress their opening and closing titles, so cropped versions could be paired with widescreen features.J Leehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15175515543694122729noreply@blogger.com